Posts tagged reviews
Movie Review: "The Tiger Next Door"

Dennis Hill and Tiger in The Tiger Next Door

At the Indianapolis International Film Festival, I was fortunate to attend the world premiere of "The Tiger Next Door", a documentary film by Camilla Calamandrei, about the keeping and breeding of captive tigers in the United States. The film is an excellent character study on Dennis Hill of Flat Rock, Indiana, whose biker looks and attitude belie his apparently gentle, naive nature.

Big cats are fascinating, and though the film moved steadily and showed its subjects beautifully, I was disappointed during the first half of the movie that Calamandrei chose not to focus on the bigger picture of the plight of endangered big cat species, but rather focused on a few individuals: Hill, his neighbors (pro- and anti- Hill), Exotic Feline Rescue Center founder Joe Taft, and a smattering of other animal-welfare supporters and government officials. I'd earlier hoped for more of a "Sharkwater"-style film, centered around an individual to tell the story of a global concern.

But Hill's battle to keep his exotic tigers, cougars and other big cats amidst impending government intervention proved to be a story worth telling: how many people know it's legal to keep - and breed - such exotic creatures in half of the United States? Or that a dead tiger is worth more than a live one in the U.S.? Or that there are likely more tigers in captivity in the U.S. than exist in the wild? Or that the rules and regulations on keeping these powerful predators aren't enforced, and even if they were, would be far from adequate in guaranteeing the health of these wondrous creatures, or the safety of the communities living around them?

The small community around Hill's Flat Rock home spoke often throughout the film, and at times added much-needed doses of humor to an otherwise somber film. Calamandrei told the story from all sides well, though I was disappointed more information wasn't included regarding a neighbor's claim that a severed tiger head and tail were found on his adjacent land.

After the film's debut, Calamandrei took questions from the crowd, who seemed more than eager to side with Joe Taft, whose Exotic Feline Rescue Center looked like paradise compared to Hill's facilities. The discussion's moderator was wise to diffuse potential arguments in the passionate audience by directing most questions to Calamandrei, who, as in the film, was sufficiently fair to all sides. I asked if she was more or less hopeful for the future of endangered species after making this film; unsurprisingly, she's not optimistic, and feels more confused about what's best for these animals now that she's learned more about their story, at home and abroad.

Hill appears to love his big cats because of their power and the difficulty of controlling them - and somewhat selfishly because of the elusiveness of white tigers - and Taft, in the film, is shown to be compassionate about their well-being and quality of life. Neither of these Hoosiers mentioned the more global issues facing these creatures, but I can't blame them: focusing on the few cats they have is more than full-time work, and attempting to ignite positive change overseas in natural tiger habitat is far beyond their abilities. Even Taft admitted, during the Q&A session, that he hasn't attempted to push change on Indiana's state regulations on captive tigers. But he suggested a start (require a strict minimum cage area to allow them to live in). And judging by one of the audience member's enthusiastic offer to support regulation (she's been involved the past several years in puppy-mill legislation), Taft's suggestion might be all that's needed to kick-start a better future for these animals.

After all, if we don't respect living creatures, especially those as beautiful and as powerful as tigers, how can we respect Earth's top predators - our fellow human beings?

(Calamandrei is currently looking for a distributor for her film. For more information, visit TheTigerNextDoor.com.)

Read More
Minus the Bear live concert MP3; review of show at the Bluebird in Bloomington, Indiana April 15, 2008
Minus the Bear live effects pedals<<UPDATE :: 4/17/08 :: I've just uploaded a slightly more refined version of the MP3 I put up yesterday. I added some compression to help the overall volume levels and adjusted the EQ so it doesn't sound so muffled. Hopefully it's more listenable.>> Seattle band Minus the Bear played a concert on their Spring 2008 tour at the Bluebird in Bloomington, Indiana last night. They put on a solid show, which you can listen to above or download (sound quality is so-so. Listenable, though.) They started their set with one of my favorite tracks, "Knights", and played a lot of songs off their latest (and in my opinion, greatest) album, Planet of Ice. If you haven't heard of Minus the Bear, this is definitely the album to start with. And if you have a set list from last night's show, let us know! I've only been listening to Minus the Bear for the past year or so and don't know much about the band, but with their collared dress shirts, they fit in with the IU college crowd quite well and looked like they could be teaching assistants for an IU business school stats class. Musicianship and vocals sounded great, though I haven't listened to the recording yet (and sorry for not naming the MtB guys - go to Wikipedia or leave a comment below if you want to name them). The drummer kept a terrific pace most of the night with a bin full of spare sticks to replenish those that accidentally flew loose during rapid-fire snare hits, and the lead guitarist had some kind of motion-sensor effects pedal(s) (Korg Kaoss pad, perhaps? I couldn't see it) that mimicked Planet of Ice's strange guitar effects perfectly as he spazzed out to some of the songs, moving at times like one of the drunken, screaming sorority girls at the front of the stage. The vocalist/guitarist sounded good but a bit drowned out by everything else, and the bassist kept terrific lock-step with the drummer and keyboardist/programmer (who used a MacBook Pro in addition to other hardware.) Openers Portugal the Man and Brooklyn's Big Sleep set a decent stage. Portugal the Man were a brilliant surprise: I'd never heard them, and though their name leaves much to be desired (sounds like a little kid's' interpretation of Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man ... or something), they let loose with a riff-heavy set that at many times echoed Black Sabbath, the Mars Volta, and... um... Wolfmother? (who at many times echo Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, etc. Sorry if this sounds like an insult if you're reading this, PtM guys, but it's meant to be a compliment.) Anyway, Portugal the Man played like Led Zeppelin at their best compared to the next group, the Big Sleep, who made me want to take a big sleep. The trio for the most part sounded like a beginning band at practice, except for the drummer, who did a good job at keeping the guitarist/vocalist and keyboardist/bassist?/vocalist in line. I haven't heard any of the band's recorded stuff, but my wife said she felt like she was in high school again listening to a friend's band play a basement party. I felt like I was in high school again trying to navigate my way through the slew of teen-angst-grunge bands riding the Nirvana/Soundgarden/Seattle wave. Thanks for coming to the wonderful corn-fed state of Indiana, guys, but really, Brooklyn's probably a much cooler place to learn how to play guitar. And thank you, Minus the Bear (please don't sue me for recording your concert and putting it online — I swear it's a simple act of spreading the good word about you to those who haven't heard!) for visiting the land of corn and Colts. And ditto to Portugal the Man: though your EP was sold out by the time my wife went to grab a copy, you've definitely earned yourselves a few new fans, so please swing back through Indiana again soon - and be sure to bring more copies of your albums. I'm looking for photos from the show to post with this, so if you have some (or better yet, video!), let me know, and enjoy the show!
Read More
High-quality consumer products are hard to find
Global economy interconnectedWith the global economy's increasing interconnectedness, it's easier to find more consumer products at cheaper prices. But are some companies sacrificing quality for a low, low price? And do we really need all the things big-box stores stock that are supposed to make our life easier? People are concerned with the financial cost of all the things money can buy, but what about the environmental cost? Not to mention the growth our economy could see if we brought some good ol' fashioned Made in America production back to "the homeland" (I use that term even though it gives me the creeps.) Though I think it's a sad state of affairs when it seems that everyone on earth is usually considered a consumer (or potential consumer) foremost and a living, breathing human being second, when I do think of myself as a consumer, I like to think of myself as an informed consumer. I scour ratings and reviews — online and in rags like Consumer Reports — of products I'm interested in, and usually think long and hard about my potential purchase and whether it's worth it. In my opinion, the products below are not worth their weight in gold (or rather something cheaper, since gold has just hit record-high prices.) Exhibit A: Kidde Fire Extinguishers and Carbon Monoxide/Smoke Detector Kidde fire exinguisherI received a small red Kidde fire extinguisher when I moved into my house about a year and a half ago. It had been sitting on our kitchen counter, ready to save our lives, when I decided to finally hang it on the wall in its cheap plastic bracket a few weeks ago. I looked at the extinguisher's meter and was dismayed that it read "Empty." I checked the information that came with the extinguisher; it told me to contact Kidde. So I went to their website, emailed them, got a response back a few days later asking for more info about the device, didn't hear back from them, and received a white version as a replacement a few weeks later, with no note. "Great!" I thought. "I'll just get rid of the old and hang the new one up." But I opened the box and noticed it had powder covering the bottom, as if it had been used or had sat on a dusty shelf for quite some time. Then I looked at its meter. "Empty," it read. Kidde must have given me either a) a unit that someone else had but was defective or b) a unit that was sitting in storage for quite some time and wasn't checked for fullness before it was shipped out. To make matters worse, that same week our Kidde-brand carbon monoxide/smoke detector went haywire for noKidde carbon monoxide detector apparent reason. Freaked out, I ran around the house and hurriedly checked our other detectors. They were all fine, so I correctly assumed there was no CO threat. This little gizmo has a meter on it showing numbers signifying the danger level, but when it malfunctioned, it simply said "Err." I looked this up in its manual, and lo and behold, just like the fire extinguisher, it told me to contact Kidde. So I unplugged it, and though I wanted to smash it with a fire extinguisher, I simply took its battery out. Enough with Kidde. Their customer service was poor, their products were even worse, and I am NOT putting my and my family's safety in their hands. The malfunctions of the two fire extinguishers and one carbon monoxide/smoke detector are enough to deter me from buying anything from them again. Exhibit B: iRobot Roomba Vaccuum iRobot Roomba for PetsThough I'd always been skeptical of iRobot's Roomba vacuums, I was lured in by a good deal on Woot! for an iRobot Roomba Scheduler with Intellibin for Pets. Many of the shoppers who commented on this particular unit said it did a great job of picking up dog hair. I didn't have to read any more: anything that can help me maintain cleanliness with three large dogs wreaking havoc in my home sounds like a great product to me (the operative words being "sounds like.")Rosie I ordered the vacuum, enthusiastically read the instructions and set up the timer with the included remote. The unit made its superhero-music-sounding beeps and started up and began its seemingly wondrous duties. It was quite entertaining for a bit: my dog Aja had a grand time attacking it, at least until I stopped laughing at her antics and walked away. The vacuum's not quite as entertaining as Rosie, the vacuuming maid robot on the Jetsons, I concede. Anyways, I was really excited about not having to sweep three dogs' fur up every day. At least until the Roomba ran its course the next day. It doesn't do well with transitions between carpet and wood floors. The dirt compartment is only about as large as my fist, requiring frequent emptying. There's not much space for the grime it picks up, when it does pick it up. The unit doesn't do a good job picking up three dogs' fur: no matter how many times it sweeps through the rooms, clumps of fur and dust bunnies are always present afterward. In the Woot! comments section, people were sure to say "this won't negate your having to vacuum regularly, but it does help." But this cheapo product does not help enough. I would've been better off to save my money from it, sweep the house daily myself, and use the money saved to reward my cleanliness with a beer every day. This product, like the next one, is much better in theory than in practice. Exhibit C: Philips Norelco All in 1 Grooming System G380 Philips Norelco Grooming System G380I bought this item because I was tired of looking like one of the scruffy dudes fromSome guys from Mastodon heavy-metal band Mastodon. Well, I didn't look that hairy, but still, my face needed some regular mowing. So I decided to give this razor set a try because it had lots of cool attachments. I opened it up, charged it, and tried it out. Surprise, surprise: I was disappointed. After trimming my goatee and mustache, I had to go back with scissors to cut all the long stragglers so they matched their neighbors. I've used the razor a half dozen times so far, and the results haven't gotten any better. The attachments are quite flimsy, though I will say none of them broke when I accidentally pulled the unit's cord and sent the whole set crashing down onto our tile floor. It still works (relatively speaking) in spite of the set's shoddy appearance, so I can't fault it too much. Side exhibit Plastic window filmI bought a lot of plastic film and tape to prevent drafts from coming in through our home's old windows, but the stuff wouldn't stay on no matter how well I cleaned the surfaces or how much tape I put on. I was trying to be green and save some heating energy this way, but since the plastic didn't work, I guess instead I wasted some oil in the process of trying to make my home more efficient. Which brings me to the point that most consumer goods, even if they're "natural," contribute to loss of natural resources in some way. And so... Though I think it's important for people to have safety devices in their house (maybe not from Kidde, though), and I think iRobot's vision of hassle-free cleaning is wonderful, and I think Norelco's razor looks cheap but can take aOil barrel hit, I do think most consumer-goods companies need to focus more on high-quality products and less on selling huge quantities of product just to make more money. It's no wonder that the United States, though relatively sparsely populated, has the one of the highest carbon footprints per household of any country in the world. Go to any big-box store in your local suburb, and you'll find aisles and aisles populated with products that: a) are most likely cheaply made, b) are most likely produced with lots of oil, and c) you could most likely do without. My advice (which I need to take myself)? Do your homework before spending lots of money on something like a robot vacuum. Read reviews and ratings online, and most importantly, if you have a friend or family member with the item in question, ask them what they think and see if you can try it out yourself. If you aren't sure or are skeptical (like I was with the vacuum), don't buy it. If you buy something whose quality is disappointing, return it, sell it on eBay, or put it on Craigslist or Freecycle. If you buy a few things from a company and all disappoint, don't support that company again. And most importantly, consider where your money would be better invested (your home? a good dinner? your retirement fund?), and what impact the production of el-cheapo goods will have on your grandchildren's future on this planet.
Have you recently made a hugely disappointing purchase? Are their some companies who, no matter how many times you give them a chance, keep producing sub-par products? Do people need to stop buying so much crap? Write a comment and share your opinions!
Read More